USA

Joan Pablo Torres Campos v. Leslie Ann Munoz

CA California 5 March 2026
Party
Lawyer; Judge
AI Tool
Unidentified
Prof. Sanction
Disciplinary referral

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Court and counsel cited 'Marriage of Twigg' as authority on prioritizing parties' emotional well‑being in custody; Twigg does not exist and the citation "34 Cal.3d 926" and parallel citations provided by counsel were fabricated. Court found reliance on this nonexistent authority and counsel later admitted Twigg was fictitious.

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    Counsel cited 'In re Marriage of Teegarden' with an incorrect citation/year and attributed a holding about emotional well‑being and pet custody that the real 1986 Teegarden decision did not hold; the citation and asserted holding were misrepresented.


Outcome

Monetary sanctionBar referral
Monetary penalty 5000 USD

View source document →

Flagged by: Robert Freund.


Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction

This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.